Hulu Hoops (and more)

Founded last August and debuting last month, Hulu might just be the future of TV on the Internet. A joint venture between Fox (News Corp) and NBC (GE), this little site with big backers bills itself as “a single source of free, on-demand programming from some of the most popular studios and online networks, helping viewers quickly and easily find and enjoy the premium content they are looking for.”

Hulu just added its first sports content this week, with content from the NBA and the NHL. Sure, the pickings are slim right now (there are only two NBA games up, they’re both months old, and they’re both Lakers games) but the site is just getting off the ground. The potential for this to be a sports hot spot is there.

Hulu now offers these sports features, free to everyone:

NBA
- 2 full-length games (including Kobe Bryant’s 81-point game)
- Daily Recaps
- Highlight reel: NBA 5-star plays
- Top 10 highlights

NHL
- NHL Best of The Week - Season 2007-08 (highlights the week's best assists, goals, saves, and hits)
- NHL Classics
- NHL Player Profiles 2007-08
- NHL Regular Season 2007-08

Action Sports
- Firsthand
- The 808 from Fuel TV

College Football
- The Boise State-Oklahoma battle in the 2007 Tostitos Fiesta Bowl

There’s no doubt that by the next time I log into Hulu there will be significantly more content. The real question is how NBC, Fox and their partners will transition these sports events from TV to online distribution. The current advertising model relies on short commercial breaks (with ads from Intel, Priceline, Direct TV etc), banner ads, overlays (promotional graphics that roll over the bottom of the screen) and maybe extra sponsorship dollars from events sponsors. Some games also offer a choice to viewers: to watch the game with commercials, or watch a two-minute advertisement at the beginning. (The Wizards/Lakers game is currently being shown with a preview for “Baby Mama.”)

The main obstacle for Hulu, going forward, will be whether it can attract other major content providers like CBS and ESPN. If Hulu can expand its broadcasting capabilities then it will be bigger than YouTube, bigger than social networking, maybe bigger than Google.


Notes:

NBC Sports broadcasts the Olympic Games (through 2012), the NFL, the NHL, Notre Dame Football, the PGA Tour, the USGA Championships, Wimbledon, the French Open, RCA Tennis Championships, the Dew Action Sports Tour, and more.

Fox Sports has broadcast rights to NFL games, MLB (1996–present), college football's Cotton Bowl, most of the Bowl Championship Series (BCS National Championship Game, Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, and Sugar Bowl), and NASCAR. ‎

YouTube Sports Channels

Consumers of sports programming are seeking out online video for a number of reasons. Whether they’re looking for Web gems, using videos to find a community, or sharing tastes, these consumers are more likely to visit YouTube than any other online video-sharing site, as shown by the graph below. (YouTube accounts for more than 96% of all videos shown by Google.)

Among sports properties, there is no clear winner in the battle for online video supremacy. Last month, I wrote about Nike and adidas in the online video world, but these aren’t the major sports properties on YouTube. On the contrary, while the Nike Soccer channel boasts 286,000 views and adidas “It Takes 5ive” channel can claim 413,000 views, the NBA channel on YouTube leads the pack with 2.7 million views.

I’ve created a chart with a sampling of sports properties and their respective rankings on YouTube. Some sports properties have no official presence on YouTube, such as Major League Baseball and NASCAR, while some (like the NFL) have made a disappointing effort.

A YouTube channel is a centralized location where other users can see a user’s videos, favorites, bulletins, comments, subscribers and video log. In the case of these sports properties, a YouTube channel is similar to a Web site or a social networking profile page. The sports properties use these landing pages to direct viewers back to their official homepages (“Visit NBA.com for over 15,000 videos”) and to help promote a campaign (“Help decide which NFL player story should be made into a Super Bowl commercial”).

And while the skeptic might point out that none of the 2008 Super Bowl ads pointed to their social media presences on YouTube, the number of Americans viewing online video is encouraging (research indicates that 78.5 million viewers watched 3.25 billion videos on YouTube.com in January). In a market where grabbing a consumer’s attention seems ever more difficult, these numbers are worth a second look.

Economics of the Final Four

March Madness is starting soon, with Conference Championships ending on Saturday and Selection Sunday coming the day after. The post-season NCAA tournament is good news for fans, great news for the 65 teams that compete, and fantastic news for CBS. But is it a good deal for the host cities of the Final Four?

The answer seems like it would be an emphatic “Yes,” but in the book The Economics of Sports (2004), Robert Baade and Victor Matheson argue that promoters overstate the economic benefits of the Big Dance. Accordingly, they maintain that in only two of the 48 men’s and women’s tournament finals before 2004 did the host city experience significant positive income growth.

In the separate Handbook on the Economics of Sports (2006), Baade again argues that the NCAA Tournament (along with other “mega-events” such as the Olympics, World Cup, Super Bowl, etc.) fails to generate the expected income because of costly government subsidies (such as stadium financing and infrastructure), security expenses, operating costs, and the likelihood that a counterbalance to the gross spending of visitors occurs when residents not attending the event decrease spending because of local price increases and their desire to avoid venue congestion. On top of that, multiplier analysis can be used to estimate the amount of money retained locally. In Economics of Sport and Recreation (2000)Chris Gratton and Peter Taylor estimate that only 20 percent of additional visitor expenditure is retained as additional local income.

On the flip side, it’s easy to see why cities line up to host the Final Four. Besides the public relations benefits and the opportunity to attract visitors who may be coming to the city for the first time, host cities also make real money. In 2006, Indianapolis hosted the Final Four and reported an economic impact of $40 million, not including direct spending from media or corporate sponsors.

Maybe this year San Antonio, the host of the 2008 Final Four, will strike it rich. But my guess is that when the dust settles and they’re counting media and visitor spending revenues, it might be harder than they think to balance their checkbook.

Virtual Ads

At their exhibit at the New Orleans Convention Center, the Spalding team showed off its plans to use NBA backboards as an advertising medium. Spalding’s rear-screen projection system would put ads on the glass backboards during timeouts, halftime, and other non-play periods.

Virtual ads are nothing new: the patent dates back to 1993 and the technology really took off in 2002, about the same time that virtual first-down lines started showing up in NFL broadcasts. But where midfield soccer ads, corporate logos behind home plate, and branded first-down lines are all examples of completely virtual advertising, the projection technology proposed by Spalding is visible to in-game spectators as well as broadcast viewers. In fact, the target audience is presumably the in-game spectator since timeouts and halftime trigger commercial breaks for broadcasters.

It will be interesting to see how this technology is received. In the 2001 World Series virtual ads were criticized as obviously fake and obnoxiously big, while today they are a fully-integrated part of the event.

Online Video Marketing Campaigns

A 30-second spot in last year’s Superbowl cost advertisers $2.6M (it was $2.7M this year) plus hundreds of thousands of dollars in production costs. But for Five Point Productions, the winner of the 2007 Doritos “Crash the Super Bowl” contest, the production cost for their ad, “Live the Flavor” cost only $12.79. Though the story is inspirational (USA Today ranked the ad 4th out of the 62 ads that were aired), the implications of this sports marketing triumph went beyond the Frito-Lay accomplishment. The larger picture is that the Doritos ad campaign from the 2007 Superbowl affected the norms of sports marketing video content: how it’s assembled, where it’s distributed, and how much it costs.

In the last year, sport marketers seem to have boosted their online presences with fancier Web sites, integrated Flash applications, Social Networking profiles, and more. But of all the improvements these companies have made online, perhaps the most effective (after a Web site) has been the use of innovative video techniques.

One of the best videos, shot with an amateur camera, features the Brazilian soccer star, Ronaldinho, as he meticulously straps on a pair of Nike soccer shoes, juggles the ball for a minute, then fires four consecutive shots off the top of the goal post without letting the ball touch the ground. The video, posted by Nikesoccer.com, has been viewed more than 21 million times as of this posting. To put that in perspective, this is roughly a quarter of the global viewership of an average Superbowl. Not bad when you consider that the clip is 2 minutes and 44 seconds, and that viewers were likely paying more attention to the video they had chosen to see than they would to a Superbowl commercial.

With the majority of online video viewers saying that they find new videos through friends’ recommendations, it’s helpful to note that the Ronaldinho video was selected as a favorite (“favorited”) by 48,740 different viewers. Youtube, like other social participation sites, allows users to tag, comment, rate, and embed the videos as well as add them to a favorites list. In the near future participants should also expect to be able to personalize, edit, an add in-video comments.

“It Takes 5ive” is the adidas basketball campaign based on the idea of believing in the team. The campaign has put together a presence on YouTube with clips of Dwight Howard, Jerry Stackhouse, Adam Morrison, TJ Ford, and other celebrity ball players. Their most viewed clip, “adidas 5ive on 5ive,” has just over a million views, and is part of a campaign that includes at least 14 other short videos. Though not as successful as the Nike soccer video campaign, adidas finishes the video with a call to action, urging viewers to see all the action by visiting their video site. Adidas’ video is a jumping off place for the basketball enthusiast to see more related videos and the accompanying marketing messages.

Digital marketing can help maximize the impact of production budgets (the Ronaldinho video would have cost more than $10M to air on the Superbowl because of its length), it can act as a gateway to a longer piece that allows for a deeper and more interactive experience, and it can work without the formal constraints of time (both in the sense of 30 second spots and the sense of ads appearing only after the 5 o’clock news). Digital marketing doesn’t mean that traditional marketing is irrelevant, but it has become enough of a force that media campaigns should have an Internet component. Moreover, traditional media should take a lesson from the 2007 Doritos “Crash the Super Bowl” contest and learn how to integrate this new format with their own.