Warsaw Guest Speakers

Last winter I posted a list of the fantastic guest speakers and visitors who came to the Warsaw Sports Business program. Here’s a list of sports industry leaders who have recently shared their insights with MBA students in my program.

Adam Antoniewicz, NBA China

Stephen Baines, Sports Business International

David Baker, AFL

Eric Barmack, ESPN

Lee Berke, LHB Sports

Declan Bolger, Stoneybatter, Inc.

Gert Boyle, Columbia Sportswear

Justin Byczek, NBC Sports

Carter Carnegie, NTRA

Tim Chen, NBA China

Emilio Collins, NBA

Jason Day, IMG

Len DeLuca, ESPN

Andy Dolich, San Francisco 49ers

Dave Doroghy, Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic & Paralympic Games

David Dunn, Athletes First

Dennis Farrell, Big West Conference

Sal Galatioto, Galatioto Sports Partners

Chris Granger, NBA

Stephen Greyser, Harvard University

Arthur Griffiths, Octagon

Eric Guthoff, IMG

David Haney, AFL

Chris Heck, NBA

Heather Higgins, NTRA

Stu Jackson, NBA

Akash Jain, NBA

Patt Keck, AT&T

Erica Kerner, adidas

Hollis Kosco, IMG

Peter Land, NTRA

Amy Lasky, NTRA

Sheng Li, Visa

Hunter Lockman, NY Knicks

Donna Lopiano, Sports Management Resources

Joe Mattson, Relay Worldwide

Mike McCarley, NBC Sports

Chris McCloskey, AFL

Jim McDonald, Cornerstone Marketing

Nolan Mecham, IMG

Jason Michelotti, Millsport

Jim Noel, ESPN

Vince O’Brien, General Motors R*Works

Donna Orender, WNBA

Lisa Orzechowski, Relay Worldwide

Andy Peake, Under Armour

Jeff Price, Sports Illustrated

Shannon Pruitt, FremantleMedia

Emma Qui, Fudan University

Dave Rosen, Electronic Arts

Peter Rotondo Jr., NTRA

Peter Rotondo Sr., NTRA

John Rozeira, General Motors R*Works

Beth Schnitzer, Pier 39

Adam Silver, NBA

Andrew Sippel, ESPN

David Stern, NBA

Robert Strand, Jarden Outdoor Solutions

Lucy Strong, Octagon

Tyler Vaught, EA Sports

Marvin Washington, University of Alberta

Carter Westfall, Helios Partners

Pat Zeedick, Nike

Chris Zimmerman, Vancouver Canucks

Facebook App -- Fan Page

The Facebook App I wrote about last time is working and in full-gear. Every day roughly 40 new users upload the application to track their favorite Olympic sports. Unfortunately, the application usage has grown linearly, rather than exponentially as we'd hoped, but there are some bright spots.

One of these bright spots is the fan page. Every application has a fan page--those users who are so pleased with the application that they become "fans." Usually this is a relatively minor percentage of overall users. For example, the Michigan St. Football Application has more than 6,000 users, but only 150 fans. Our Olympic Games 2008 application has only 200 users so far, but 44 fans.

Facebook, for all its flaws, allows for some pretty neat data collection. The fan page enables us to run numbers on even a relatively modest sample size, and to come up with some neat findings.

The table to the left, for example, shows the gender and age range of the fans page. It's startling to see that more of our Olympic Games Application fans are women rather than men. And, looking at the ages, 40% are minors.

It would be interesting to compare these numbers with Facebook's overall demographics or the Neilsen rating demographics for the Beijing Olympics on NBC. My guess is these numbers are much closer to the former group than the latter.

In an unrelated surprise: the 44 fans of the application aren't just Americans. There are users from Switzerland, New Zealand, China, Canada, Australia, Morocco, England, Lebanon, and elsewhere.

Olympics Facebook Application

I'm happy to announce that the Facebook application I created (with George Mandis of Snaptortoise) is now up-and-running.

Olympic Games 2008 is a fun way to track medal standings by country, rank, or event. And though we don't have high usage numbers yet, this project has taught me a lot about the opportunities and challenges surrounding the promotion of a Facebook application. I've put links on content-sharing sites like Digg and Reddit, posted on group forums like Yahoo groups and Tribe, and mentioned it on StumbleUpon. So far, my best luck has come directly from Facebook, where friends and friends-of-friends have helped our little sports app take off.

The best part of this experiment has been what I've learned about running a project that unfolds in real time. If Uzbekistan gets a medal and we don't have a flag ready for that country, or there's a tie for bronze, we need to adapt quickly or lose viewers.

The hardest part of this project has been entering in stats for each event. Was there a way to automate this? Next time I'm looking for an open source data feed.

Hulu Hoops (and more)

Founded last August and debuting last month, Hulu might just be the future of TV on the Internet. A joint venture between Fox (News Corp) and NBC (GE), this little site with big backers bills itself as “a single source of free, on-demand programming from some of the most popular studios and online networks, helping viewers quickly and easily find and enjoy the premium content they are looking for.”

Hulu just added its first sports content this week, with content from the NBA and the NHL. Sure, the pickings are slim right now (there are only two NBA games up, they’re both months old, and they’re both Lakers games) but the site is just getting off the ground. The potential for this to be a sports hot spot is there.

Hulu now offers these sports features, free to everyone:

NBA
- 2 full-length games (including Kobe Bryant’s 81-point game)
- Daily Recaps
- Highlight reel: NBA 5-star plays
- Top 10 highlights

NHL
- NHL Best of The Week - Season 2007-08 (highlights the week's best assists, goals, saves, and hits)
- NHL Classics
- NHL Player Profiles 2007-08
- NHL Regular Season 2007-08

Action Sports
- Firsthand
- The 808 from Fuel TV

College Football
- The Boise State-Oklahoma battle in the 2007 Tostitos Fiesta Bowl

There’s no doubt that by the next time I log into Hulu there will be significantly more content. The real question is how NBC, Fox and their partners will transition these sports events from TV to online distribution. The current advertising model relies on short commercial breaks (with ads from Intel, Priceline, Direct TV etc), banner ads, overlays (promotional graphics that roll over the bottom of the screen) and maybe extra sponsorship dollars from events sponsors. Some games also offer a choice to viewers: to watch the game with commercials, or watch a two-minute advertisement at the beginning. (The Wizards/Lakers game is currently being shown with a preview for “Baby Mama.”)

The main obstacle for Hulu, going forward, will be whether it can attract other major content providers like CBS and ESPN. If Hulu can expand its broadcasting capabilities then it will be bigger than YouTube, bigger than social networking, maybe bigger than Google.


Notes:

NBC Sports broadcasts the Olympic Games (through 2012), the NFL, the NHL, Notre Dame Football, the PGA Tour, the USGA Championships, Wimbledon, the French Open, RCA Tennis Championships, the Dew Action Sports Tour, and more.

Fox Sports has broadcast rights to NFL games, MLB (1996–present), college football's Cotton Bowl, most of the Bowl Championship Series (BCS National Championship Game, Fiesta Bowl, Orange Bowl, and Sugar Bowl), and NASCAR. ‎

Economics of the Final Four

March Madness is starting soon, with Conference Championships ending on Saturday and Selection Sunday coming the day after. The post-season NCAA tournament is good news for fans, great news for the 65 teams that compete, and fantastic news for CBS. But is it a good deal for the host cities of the Final Four?

The answer seems like it would be an emphatic “Yes,” but in the book The Economics of Sports (2004), Robert Baade and Victor Matheson argue that promoters overstate the economic benefits of the Big Dance. Accordingly, they maintain that in only two of the 48 men’s and women’s tournament finals before 2004 did the host city experience significant positive income growth.

In the separate Handbook on the Economics of Sports (2006), Baade again argues that the NCAA Tournament (along with other “mega-events” such as the Olympics, World Cup, Super Bowl, etc.) fails to generate the expected income because of costly government subsidies (such as stadium financing and infrastructure), security expenses, operating costs, and the likelihood that a counterbalance to the gross spending of visitors occurs when residents not attending the event decrease spending because of local price increases and their desire to avoid venue congestion. On top of that, multiplier analysis can be used to estimate the amount of money retained locally. In Economics of Sport and Recreation (2000)Chris Gratton and Peter Taylor estimate that only 20 percent of additional visitor expenditure is retained as additional local income.

On the flip side, it’s easy to see why cities line up to host the Final Four. Besides the public relations benefits and the opportunity to attract visitors who may be coming to the city for the first time, host cities also make real money. In 2006, Indianapolis hosted the Final Four and reported an economic impact of $40 million, not including direct spending from media or corporate sponsors.

Maybe this year San Antonio, the host of the 2008 Final Four, will strike it rich. But my guess is that when the dust settles and they’re counting media and visitor spending revenues, it might be harder than they think to balance their checkbook.